Field observations & occurrences
Darwin Core
The core vocabulary for occurrence records: what was seen, where, when, and by whom.
Primary sources & specifications
The list below is Clio’s current foundation map. These links point to primary academic papers and normative or authoritative specifications; adoption and export integrations remain work in progress.
Field observations & occurrences
The core vocabulary for occurrence records: what was seen, where, when, and by whom.
Ecological inventories
Sampling effort, protocol, completeness, and inferable absences for traps, tows, transects, and plots.
Biological imaging
Sample preparation, acquisition, instrument, and analysis metadata for reusable microscopy data.
Microscopy files
Machine-readable image dimensions, channels, objectives, and physical pixel metadata, including OME-TIFF and OME-XML.
Cloud-native imaging
A next-generation format direction for large, multi-resolution biological image collections.
Images & media
TDWG multimedia terms for linking a photograph, scan, or recording to a biodiversity occurrence.
Geology
Geoscience terms for mineralogical, petrological, and palaeontological specimens where Darwin Core alone is not enough.
Water, sequences & eDNA
Environmental context for sequence-linked samples: location, depth, environment, and sampling method.
Packaging & publication
Dataset context, methods, coverage, tables, and metadata packaged for a future Darwin Core Archive export.
Collection descriptions
A TDWG vocabulary for describing whole collections—natural-history drawers, specimen archives, and microscopy sets.
People & physical samples
Persistent identifiers for contributor credit and retained geological samples, subject to an implemented minting and linking policy.
Stewardship
The cross-cutting direction: data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.
Implementation status: the standards are documented foundations, not evidence that Clio currently publishes to GBIF, ALA, the EBI BioImage Archive, or any other repository.
Quality evidence
Clio’s planned three-tier verification workflow is informed by the citizen-science data-quality literature, including Kosmala et al. (2016) and the GBIF data-quality requirements.
Read the quality review ↗